How sweet something tastes is clearly a matter of acclimation.

When you cut sugar from your diet, your sense of sweetness gets “downregulated” in a few weeks. Afterwards, sweet things often taste too sweet.

So I have a plan to solve, or at least make a substantial dent in, the obesity crisis.

If all food companies use less sugar, it will soon taste the same to everyone, and everyone will be healthier. Total win.

So why hasn’t this been done, and why is there so much sugar in everything? Why did the sugar content settle at such a high level, when using half the sugar would subjectively taste the same?

There’s an incentive/coordination problem.

If you’re a food company, and you use more sugar than your competitors, you get more sales, because your stuff is relatively sweeter, which people’s limbic systems interpret as a good thing. The programming is simple and stupid: “sugar = good, more sugar = more good”. That’s how we got high fructose corn syrup in everything – it’s an arms race of food companies hacking your inner monkey.

The result is like the famous example where one person at a concert stands on their tiptoes to get a better view, so the next guy does it to see over him, and soon everyone is standing on tiptoes just to see exactly as they saw before, but now everyone’s feet hurt – a no-win, shitty equilibrium. Except the downside of the sugar arms race is an obesity epidemic and soaring healthcare costs, not just sore toes (except when they’re about to fall off due of diabetes).

It’s a good target for regulation. Not with idiotic sugar taxes, but sugar content limits.

Again, it soon all tastes the same to everyone, food companies are exactly where they were, and as for the sugar producers, the excess sugar can be made into rum and we all win once again.

Of course, food companies will inevitably try to cheat, so it’s important to phrase the regulation carefully to, for example, cover all different kinds of sugar. It’s also important to avoid “consulting” “stakeholders”, such as sugar producers and candy companies and their “legitimate interests”, as expressed through thick brown envelopes and thicker browner underage prostitutes for regulators and lawmakers. Which is how regulation is often made.

But assuming we do it right, it’s a pure win for all, and one of the most important wins we can score now.


Sugar is sweet, love is sweeter.

Zbyhnev

Share
Published by
Zbyhnev

Recent Posts

  • Uncategorized

Covid-19: alternate origin stories

Pre-Wuhan Covid-19 in Italy, bioweapons research in Russia and China, and curious coincidences. There’s a lot of credible information that…

4 years ago
  • Uncategorized

Penisocratic method #2

Exciting year ahead for human space exploration For reasons beyond my understanding, there are people who aren't closely watching how…

5 years ago
  • How to fix the world
  • Penisocratic method
  • Politics

Penisocratic Method #1

Today, let me introduce you to a new post format. Here's the thing: the click-through "tile" design of the website…

5 years ago
  • History
  • Mood lift
  • Politics
  • Science!

Why Scotland is Pakistan

I have a huge discovery to share with you: Scotland is Pakistan. Consider: A mountaineous hinterland full of angry bearded…

5 years ago
  • History
  • Politics

The Asian powderkeg

Right now, Asia is a powderkeg with several simultaneously lit fuses. There are at least four conflicts in Asia from…

5 years ago
  • Politics
  • Science!
  • The Scolding of the Stupid

The vibranium shield of willful ignorance

Nobody is more imaginative than a person who doesn’t want to concede an obvious point. As the internet brought 24/7…

5 years ago